Women and the Transnational Cleavage: Closing the Internationalism Gap?

Nina Obermeier
King’s College London

Traditional Gender Gap in Internationalism


Traditional Gender Gap in Internationalism


  • International trade (Guisinger 2009; Mansfield and Mutz 2009; Mayda and Rodrik 2005; Scheve and Slaughter 2001)

Traditional Gender Gap in Internationalism


  • International trade (Guisinger 2009; Mansfield and Mutz 2009; Mayda and Rodrik 2005; Scheve and Slaughter 2001)

  • European integration (Gabel 1998; Liebert 1999; Nelsen and Guth 2000)

Traditional Gender Gap in Internationalism


  • International trade (Guisinger 2009; Mansfield and Mutz 2009; Mayda and Rodrik 2005; Scheve and Slaughter 2001)

  • European integration (Gabel 1998; Liebert 1999; Nelsen and Guth 2000)

  • (Some types of) immigration (O’Rourke and Sinnott 2006; Ponce 2017)

Gender Gap in Western Europe Over Time


Support for European integration


Gender Gap in Western Europe Over Time


Support for immigration


Gender Gap in Western Europe Over Time


Support for globalization


Gender Gap in Western Europe Over Time


Support for free trade


Existing Explanations for Gender Gap


Existing Explanations for Gender Gap


  • International trade: concern about economic volatility (Guisinger 2017); trade as competition (Mutz 2021)

Existing Explanations for Gender Gap


  • International trade: concern about economic volatility (Guisinger 2017); trade as competition (Mutz 2021)

  • EU: Lack of knowledge (Nelsen and Guth 2000); responsiveness to gender mainstreaming (De Vries 2018)

Existing Explanations for Gender Gap


  • International trade: concern about economic volatility (Guisinger 2017); trade as competition (Mutz 2021)

  • EU: Lack of knowledge (Nelsen and Guth 2000); responsiveness to gender mainstreaming (De Vries 2018)

  • Immigration: Threat to gender equality (Ponce 2017)

Argument



Narrowing of gender gap due to increased linking of anti-internationalism to right-wing extremism as transnational cleavage arises and populist radical right becomes more prominent

Argument



Linking of anti-internationalism to right-wing extremism in public discourse

Argument



Linking of anti-internationalism to right-wing extremism in public discourse

🡻

Increased internationalism among people who reject right-wing extremism

Argument


Higher sensitivity to social norms and discomfort with political extremism among women (Harteveld and Ivarsflaten 2016; Harteveld et al. 2017; Mayer 1999; Oshri et al. 2022)

Argument


Higher sensitivity to social norms and discomfort with political extremism among women (Harteveld and Ivarsflaten 2016; Harteveld et al. 2017; Mayer 1999; Oshri et al. 2022)

+

Change in public discourse around anti-internationalism

Argument


Higher sensitivity to social norms and discomfort with political extremism among women (Harteveld and Ivarsflaten 2016; Harteveld et al. 2017; Mayer 1999; Oshri et al. 2022)

+

Change in public discourse around anti-internationalism

🡻

Internationalism increases more strongly among women than men

Hypotheses



H1: The effect of closer links between anti-internationalism and right-wing extremism in public discourse on support for international economic integration will be stronger among women than among men.


H2: The moderating effect of gender on the relationship between changes in public discourse and support for internationalism will be stronger in countries where PRR parties are the primary political actors promoting anti-internationalism.

Hypotheses



H1: The effect of closer links between anti-internationalism and right-wing extremism in public discourse on support for international economic integration will be stronger among women than among men.


H2: The moderating effect of gender on the relationship between changes in public discourse and support for internationalism will be stronger in countries where PRR parties are the primary political actors promoting anti-internationalism.

Resesarch Design


  • Measure of link between Euroskepticism and right-wing extremism in media discourse in 8 Western European countries (Austria, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, UK) from 2000 to 2019 (Obermeier 2021)

Resesarch Design


  • Measure of link between Euroskepticism and right-wing extremism in media discourse in 8 Western European countries (Austria, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, UK) from 2000 to 2019 (Obermeier 2021)

  • Merged with Eurobarometer survey data

Resesarch Design


  • Measure of link between Euroskepticism and right-wing extremism in media discourse in 8 Western European countries (Austria, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, UK) from 2000 to 2019 (Obermeier 2021)

  • Merged with Eurobarometer survey data

  • Individual level + country year level control variables

Results


Relationship between discourse and support for EU by gender


Evidence for Mechanism


Evidence for Mechanism


  • Posited mechanism: sensitivity to social norms

Evidence for Mechanism


  • Posited mechanism: sensitivity to social norms

  • Survey experiment with 1,770 respondents in France in August 2023

Evidence for Mechanism


  • Posited mechanism: sensitivity to social norms

  • Survey experiment with 1,770 respondents in France in August 2023

  • Treatment: exposure to information about strength of social norm against racism

Evidence for Mechanism


Effect of social norms treatment on internationalism


Conclusion


  • Gender gap in support for international integration narrowing in Western Europe

Conclusion


  • Gender gap in support for international integration narrowing in Western Europe

  • Driven by closer linking of anti-internationalism with extremism

Conclusion


  • Gender gap in support for international integration narrowing in Western Europe

  • Driven by closer linking of anti-internationalism with extremism

  • Importance of (changing) relationship between gender and the populist radical right


Thank you!


nina.obermeier@kcl.ac.uk